Learning materials / Facilitator guide
60-minute session · guide-home
A home seen from a cat’s point of view
Adult caregivers, community educators and supervised teen learners; no live cat is needed.

Session outcomes
- Distinguish observation from interpretation in a fictional case.
- Redesign one resource bottleneck within a modest budget.
- Choose a safe next action when a health warning appears.
Session flow
5 minutes
Welcome and boundaries
- Say: ‘Today we will practice noticing, planning and knowing when to ask for help. No cat has to perform, and we will not diagnose a real animal.’
- Explain that learners may speak, write, dictate or pass. Keep real veterinary histories private. If someone describes an active emergency, pause participation so they can contact a veterinarian.
10 minutes
Observation sorting
- Read the fictional case: ‘Luca lives with one adult cat, Juniper. At 7 pm the washing machine starts. Juniper pauses outside the laundry-room doorway, turns and rests behind a chair. Her food, water and litter box are all inside that room.’
- Ask learners to list three observations and two unknowns on ws-care-01. Contrast ‘turned away after the machine started’ with ‘is afraid of all machines.’
- Invite two responses. Ask what additional ordinary observation would help without deliberately running the machine or moving the cat.
15 minutes
Map the home
- Draw or describe a living room, hallway and laundry room. Mark the resources, the chair, traffic and an exit route.
- In pairs or individually, complete ws-care-02. Require one safe no-cost change, one practical limitation and an explanation of which choice the change adds.
- Offer the constraint: ‘The caregiver cannot lift heavy furniture and has a small budget.’ Encourage reachable floor-level options, not a shopping list.
- Have each group explain how they would retain a familiar resource and check voluntary use.
15 minutes
Make the care handoff usable
- Add this fictional event: ‘Two adults both assume the other checked the food bowl. No one knows whether Juniper ate breakfast.’
- Use ws-care-03 to assign a primary and backup caregiver and write a factual sample entry. Ask learners to include unknowns rather than invent intake.
- Discuss how shared responsibility can be checked without collecting more private information than necessary. Have each participant read one clear handoff sentence.
10 minutes
Referral decision practice
- Read two separate prompts: ‘Juniper chooses the old bed instead of a new safe bed’ and ‘Juniper repeatedly strains in the box with almost no urine.’
- Ask learners to write the next action for each on ws-care-06 before discussing.
- Debrief: an ordinary preference can be observed without forcing a choice; possible urinary obstruction requires immediate emergency veterinary care. Do not wait for more data or treat the box layout as a diagnosis.
5 minutes
Exit reflection
- Ask: ‘What did you observe, what would you change, and what would make you stop or call for help?’
- Invite a private self-reflection score using the course rubric only if the learner wants one. End with one realistic next action, not a promise to buy equipment.
Discussion prompts
- Which details are facts, and which explanations remain uncertain?
- Does your proposed change improve usable access or just add another object?
- How can the plan fit a caregiver’s budget or mobility without lowering welfare expectations?
- What finding means you should stop gathering observations and seek help now?
Facilitator answer notes
- The case establishes a sequence and a resource bottleneck; it does not establish a diagnosis, temperament label or exact cause of avoidance.
- A separate accessible food or water location and a quiet resting option are reasonable plans; retain suitable familiar choices and review use. There is no single correct floor plan.
- A good handoff identifies responsibility, time and uncertainty. ‘Food offered’ is different from ‘food eaten.’
- The urinary prompt is an emergency. An excellent answer acts promptly and does not propose punishment, a litter experiment or waiting for a complete log.
- Score the learner’s reasoning and safe next action, not the beauty of the drawing or the cat’s willingness to use a new object.
Adaptations
- Read the case aloud and provide written text; allow a verbal map instead of drawing.
- Use a one-room or single-cat scenario when that fits the group; larger homes are not the standard for success.
- Allow observers, breaks and anonymous fictional answers. Do not ask learners to disclose finances or pet loss.
- For younger supervised learners, focus on observation and asking a trusted adult; adults retain care and referral decisions.
Welfare and facilitation boundaries
- Use fictional cases and props. Do not bring cats into a group to test reactions.
- No learner should manipulate a painful area, provoke resource guarding or delay veterinary care for an activity.
- This workshop and its scores are educational self-reflection, not veterinary review, professional certification or a welfare inspection.
Facilitator notes
- Record which prompt caused confusion and which explanation resolved it; do not record identifiable veterinary histories.
- If learners confuse silence with comfort or observation with diagnosis, reteach that distinction before adding more content.
Session sources
- Cat body languagePDSA
- Your Cat’s Environmental Needs: Practical Tips for Cat CaregiversFeline Veterinary Medical Association (FelineVMA)
- Everything You Should Know About Litter BoxesFelineVMA / Cat Friendly Homes
- Feline Lower Urinary Tract DiseaseCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Feline Health Center
- Cat Not Eating Normally Requires Medical CareFelineVMA / Cat Friendly Homes